[Projectleiding] Orga sentiment survey for MCH2021 Februari breakpoint

[Janneke van den Brand]

Hi all,

Ik denk dat we het zo simpel mogelijk moeten houden en de vraag gewoon
direct moeten stellen. Meer zoals in het voorbeeld van Jeroen.
We hadden ook afgesproken dat iedereen de vraag direct aan de eigen teams
zou stellen, dus niet aan de hele orga.
Hier mijn iets aangepaste voorstel. Ik denk niet dat we te bang moeten zijn
voor neutraliteit, deze vraag komt niet uit de lucht vallen. Het enige niet
neutrale aan de vraag is dat er uit blijkt dat er een optie is om het niet
door te laten gaan. Maar dat weet iedereen al lang, dat zit al in het idee
van breakpoint meetings. Kijk maar wat jullie hier van denken, dit is ook
een snelle draft, ik wil de vraag in elk geval dit weekend aan Deco gaan
stellen, anders wordt het wel heel kort dag.







*Soon (feb 24), we as team Projectleiding (PL) have another
"breakpoint"meeting in which we will try to establish the viability of the
event. Asis common with debugging through breakpoints, we aim to introspect
allthe known variables, and to evaluate the possible outcomes for the
manyunknowns.*

*We also depend on input from the orga to make a well balanced decision.
Our collective wisdom is essential in this.That's why we would like to ask
for your input in answering the question that's on everyone's mind:*

* Should we continue organising MCH2021? Do you think it is viable to have
MCH2021 take place in August 2021?*



*We really value your input and hope to get many replies. Thanks for taking
the time for expressing your views!*


On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 13:19, Elger Jonker via Projectleiding <
projectleiding at lists.ifcat.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Even ter bevestiging: we gaan geen mailtje sturen naar de orga, maar dit
> vragen we dus zelf uit aan de teamleden of 1e-lijns contacten.
>
> Ik denk dat je aan deze vragen een redelijke houvast om te bepalen waar de
> balans naar toe slaat. Ik zal ze toepassen maar wel op een meer organische
> manier dan zo opgesomd :) Het gesprek moet wel leuk blijven natuurlijk!
>
> Laten we kijken of we hiermee een voldoende meningsbeeld kunnen krijgen
> over 2021.
>
> Groeten,
> Elger
>
>
> > On Feb 10, 2021, at 21:38, Juerd Waalboer <juerd at tnx.nl> wrote:
> >
> > # DRAFT #
> >
> > This is a draft for the survey, as discussed in today's PL healthcheck
> > meeting. During writing the draft, I determined that a single question
> > is unlikely to provide us with sufficient data, so I tore it apart into
> > several very open questions. I've chosen the most neutral wording I
> > could think of, because I think it doesn't help if we ask leading
> > questions.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > # DRAFT #
> >
> > Hi MCH orga,
> >
> > Soon (feb 24), we as team Projectleiding (PL) have another "breakpoint"
> > meeting in which we will try to establish the viability of the event. As
> > is common with debugging through breakpoints, we aim to introspect all
> > the known variables, and to evaluate the possible outcomes for the many
> > unknowns.
> >
> > We will look at a lot of numbers, of course, but we also depend on input
> from
> > the orga. Our collective wisdom is essential for making the right
> decision.
> > That's why we have a few open questions for you in your capacity as
> > an organizer of MCH2021.
> >
> > We would like to receive many replies, but feel free to skip any
> questions:
> >
> >    - Which team are you in?
> >
> >    - Are you answering these questions on your own behalf, or on behalf
> of
> >      your team?
> >
> >    - How are you doing?
> >
> >    - What is your expectation of the summer of 2021?
> >
> >    - Corona rules evolve over time. In your opinion, are we sufficiently
> >      flexible to deal with last-minute changes?
> >
> >    - What are your thoughts about covid safety rules in the context of an
> >      event?
> >
> >    - Are you looking forward to MCH2021?
> >
> >    - Is there anything else that you would like to share with PL?
> >
> > If you would like to share your answers in the publicly archived PL
> mailing
> > list, please reply to <projectleiding at lists.ifcat.org>.
> >
> > But we understand that some people may want to include personal matters.
> > (this is entirely optional!) If you prefer to inform the PL members
> > privately without a publicly readable archive, please reply to
> > <projectleiding-prive at lists.ifcat.org> instead.
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time for expressing your views!
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Projectleiding mailing list
> > Projectleiding at lists.ifcat.org
> > https://lists.ifcat.org/mailman/listinfo/projectleiding
>
> _______________________________________________
> Projectleiding mailing list
> Projectleiding at lists.ifcat.org
> https://lists.ifcat.org/mailman/listinfo/projectleiding
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ifcat.org/pipermail/projectleiding/attachments/20210213/6ad07fe6/attachment.html>